4.7 Article

Algorithms for the unrelated parallel machine scheduling problem with a resource constraint

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 271, Issue 3, Pages 839-848

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.05.056

Keywords

Scheduling; Unrelated parallel machines; Renewable resource; Mixed-integer linear programming; Constraint programming

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We consider the unrelated parallel machine scheduling problem with a renewable resource constraint (UPMR). For the two-machine variant of the problem, we propose a very efficient mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model. For more than two machines, we propose a two-stage heuristic, which first uses a MILP model to calculate a lower bound and assign jobs to machines, and then uses a constraint programming (CP) model to schedule jobs on machines. If the solution of the two-stage heuristic is not proven optimal, the problem is solved using a CP model for the complete UPMR, with a hot start provided by the two-stage heuristic. New large benchmark problem instances with up to 1000 jobs are generated. Extensive computational experiments are carried out on these, as well as on smaller instances from the literature. Our algorithms obtain excellent solutions for much larger problem instances than previously proposed methods. For the UPMR with two machines, our MILP model solves all test instances to optimality in very modest computation times, greatly outperforming previously proposed methods. For the variant with more than two machines, our overall algorithm, which combines the two-stage heuristic with a full CP model, finds for the smaller instances from the literature better than or the same solutions as all previously proposed methods in considerably less computation time. Difficult types of problem instances are also identified for future research. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available