4.7 Article

A matheuristic decomposition approach for the scheduling of a single-source and multiple destinations pipeline system

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 268, Issue 2, Pages 665-687

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.01.032

Keywords

Distribution; Multiproduct pipeline; Scheduling; Decomposition approach; Mixed integer linear programming

Funding

  1. Erasmus Mundus SMART2 support [552042-EM-1-2014-1-FR-ERA MUNDUS-EMA2]
  2. Brazilian Oil Company PETROBRAS [0050.0066666.11.9, 5850.0102354.16.9]
  3. CAPES - DS
  4. CNPq [305816/2014-4, 309119/2015-4, 406507/2016-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An improvement on the scheduling of pumping and delivery operations in an installed pipeline network can lead to considerable profits to the using companies, such as oil companies. This paper proposes a decomposition approach that integrates heuristic procedures and mixed integer linear programming (MILP) models, a matheuristic, to solve the long-term scheduling of a pipeline system, which connects a single source to multiple distribution centers. The approach provides a rigorous inventory management and flow rate control taking into account several operational aspects, such as simultaneous deliveries, and prespecified periods of tank maintenance and pipeline maintenance. To validate the developed approach, two case studies were devised. In case study 1, several instances of an illustrative network were solved and case study 2 addressed three examples of a real-world network: base instance; extended instance with maintenance periods; and model performance tests. Valid solutions that can be operationally implemented were obtained for all executions in a reasonable computational time. Detailed discussions of the obtained solutions are presented and indicate an inventory control in accordance with operational requirements. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available