4.7 Article

Pulsating hydraulic fracturing technology in low permeability coal seams

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2015.05.025

Keywords

Gas drainage; Pulsating hydraulic fracturing; Fatigue damage; Permeability improvement

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51274195]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB201205]
  3. Ph. D. Foundation of Henan Polytechnic University [60207005]
  4. Education Department of Hennan Province [14B440007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on the difficult situation of gas drainage in a single coal bed of high gas content and low permeability, we investigate the technology of pulsating hydraulic pressure relief, the process of crank plunger movement and the mechanism of pulsating pressure formation using theoretical research, mathematical modeling and field testing. We analyze the effect of pulsating pressure on the formation and growth of fractures in coal by using the pulsating hydraulic theory in hydraulics. The research results show that the amplitude of fluctuating pressure tends to increase in the case where the exit is blocked, caused by pulsating pressure reflection and frictional resistance superposition, and it contributes to the growth of fractures in coal. The crack initiation pressure of pulsating hydraulic fracturing is 8 MPa, which is half than that of normal hydraulic fracturing; the pulsating hydraulic fracturing influence radius reaches 8 m. The total amount of gas extraction is increased by 3.6 times, and reaches 50 L/min at the highest point. The extraction flow increases greatly, and is 4 times larger than that of drilling without fracturing and 1.2 times larger than that of normal hydraulic fracturing. The technology provides a technical measure for gas drainage of high gas content and low permeability in the single coal bed. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Mining & Technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available