4.5 Article

Optogenetic activation of the central amygdala generates addiction-like preference for reward

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 2086-2100

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13967

Keywords

adverse consequences; decision-making; incentive salience; motivation; rats

Categories

Funding

  1. GISOS from Wesleyan University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drug and behavioural addictions are characterized by an intense and focused pursuit of a single reward above all others. Pursuit of the addictive reward is often compulsively sought despite adverse consequences and better alternative outcomes. Here, we explored the ability of the central amygdala (CeA) to powerfully bias choice, causing specific rewards to be almost compulsively preferred. Rats were trained on an operant choice task in which they could choose to respond on either of the two levers to receive a sucrose reward, one of which was paired with optogenetic stimulation of the CeA using channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2). Rats developed an almost exclusive preference for the laser-paired reward over the otherwise equal unpaired reward. We found that this preference for stimulation-paired reward persists even when a much larger sucrose reward is offered as an alternative (contingency management) or when this preferred reward is paired with adverse consequences such as progressively larger electric foot shock, time delays or effort requirements. We also report that when challenged with foot shock, a small proportion of these animals (approximate to 20%) retained an exclusive laser-paired reward preference, whereas others began to seek the alternate reward when the shock reached high levels. Lastly, we confirmed that optogenetic CeA stimulation was not independently rewarding if delivered in the absence of a paired sucrose reward. These results suggest a role for the CeA in focusing motivation and desire to excessive levels, generating addiction-like behaviour that persists in the face of more rewarding alternatives and adverse consequences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available