4.5 Article

Dynamic changes in intrathymic ILC populations during murine neonatal development

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 9, Pages 1481-1491

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201847511

Keywords

Innate lymphoid cells; Lymphoid tissue; Neonate; RORt; Thymus

Categories

Funding

  1. Senior Research Fellowship from the Wellcome Trust [110199/Z/15/Z]
  2. MRC Programme award [MR/N000919/1]
  3. [DFG-FE578/3]
  4. MRC [MR/N000919/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Wellcome Trust [110199/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Members of the innate lymphoid cell (ILC) family have been implicated in the development of thymic microenvironments and the recovery of this architecture after damage. However, a detailed characterization of this family in the thymus is lacking. To better understand the thymic ILC compartment, we have utilized multiple in vivo models including the fate mapping of inhibitor of DNA binding-2 (Id2) expression and the use of Id2 reporter mice. Our data demonstrate that ILCs are more prominent immediately after birth, but were rapidly diluted as the T-cell development program increased. As observed in the embryonic thymus, CCR6(+)NKp46(-) lymphoid tissue inducer (LTi) cells were the main ILC3 population present, but numbers of these cells swiftly declined in the neonate and ILC3 were barely detectable in adult thymus. This loss of ILC3 means ILC2 are the dominant ILC population in the thymus. Thymic ILC2 were able to produce IL-5 and IL-13, were located within the medulla, and did not result from ILC3 plasticity. Furthermore, in WT mice, thymic ILC2 express little RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand) arguing that functionally, these cells provide different signals to LTi cells in the thymus. Collectively, these data reveal a dynamic switch in the ILC populations of the thymus during neonatal development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available