4.7 Article

Production of upgraded bio-oils by biomass catalytic pyrolysis in an auger reactor using low cost materials

Journal

FUEL
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 17-22

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.044

Keywords

Biomass; Catalytic pyrolysis; Auger reactor; Clay minerals; Red mud

Funding

  1. Spanish MINECO
  2. European FEDER [CTQ2012-37984-C02-01]
  3. Aragon Regional Government (DGA)
  4. Caixa Bank [GA-LC-015/2011]
  5. European Social Found
  6. CSIC
  7. Spanish MICINN
  8. CSIC [RYC-2009-04483]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Production of upgraded bio-oils by catalytic pyrolysis of wood biomass was studied in an auger reactor using low cost materials as catalysts. These materials included several clay minerals (sepiolite, bentonite and attapulgite) and an industrial waste from alumina production, known as red mud. The influence of temperature (400-500 degrees C) and the effect of catalyst to biomass ratio (3:1-1:6, in weight) were also analysed. A temperature of 450 degrees C and the lowest catalyst proportion (1:6, in weight) were selected as the most appropriate to aim the pyrolysis for bio-oil production. Catalyst to biomass ratio resulted critical since an excess on catalyst addition seemed to reduce liquid production while char yield increased. Under the selected conditions, the catalysts tested improved the characteristics of the obtained bio-oil as fuel (viscosity, acidity, oxygen content and calorific value). For every catalyst, the viscosity of the organic liquid fraction decreased (up to 34% in case of bentonite) while lower heating value increased (up to 20% in red mud tests). Concerning acidity, sepiolite and red mud produced a decrease in the total acid number (around 29% and 23%, respectively). The stability of the organic fraction after aging test (equivalent to long time storage) was also improved by each catalyst. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available