4.2 Article

Impact of ruxolitinib pretreatment on outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages 305-317

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13099

Keywords

calreticulin; JAK2; myelofibrosis; myeloproliferative neoplasm; reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation; ruxolitinib

Categories

Funding

  1. Novartis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IntroductionRuxolitinib is the first approved drug for treatment of myelofibrosis, but its impact of outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is unknown. Patients and methodsWe reported on 159 myelofibrosis patients (pts) with a median age of 59years (r: 28-74) who received reduced intensity ASCT between 2000 and 2015 in eight German centers from related (n=23), matched (n=86) or mismatched (n=50) unrelated donors. Forty-six (29%) patients received ruxolitinib at any time point prior to ASCT. The median daily dose of ruxolitinib was 30mg (range 10-40mg) and the median duration of treatment was 4.9months (range 0.4-39.1months). ResultsPrimary graft failure was seen in 2 pts (4%) in the ruxolitinib and 3 (2%) in the non-ruxolitinib group. Engraftment and incidence of acute GVHD grade II to IV and III/IV did not differ between groups (37% vs 39% and 19% vs 28%, respectively), nor did the non-relapse mortality at 2years (23% vs 23%). A trend for lower risk of relapse was seen in the ruxolitinib group (9% vs 17%, P=.2), resulting in a similar 2year DFS and OS (68% vs 60% and 73% vs 70%, respectively). No difference in any outcome variable could be seen between ruxolitinib responders and those who failed or lost response to ruxolitinib. ConclusionsThese results suggest that ruxolitinib pretreatment in myelofibrosis patient does not negatively influence outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available