4.6 Article

Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Review Medicine, General & Internal

Hemorrhagic Shock

Jeremy W. Cannon

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2018)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Anti-inflammatory effects of exercise: role in diabetes and cardiovascular disease

Bente Klarlund Pedersen

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION (2017)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals

Clovis Mariano Faggion et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2017)

Review Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Understanding heart failure; explaining telehealth - a hermeneutic systematic review

Trisha Greenhalgh et al.

BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS (2017)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed

Penny Whiting et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

John P. A. Ioannidis

MILBANK QUARTERLY (2016)

Article Health Policy & Services

Evidence-based medicine - an appropriate tool for evidence-based health policy? A case study from Norway

Kirsti Malterud et al.

HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS (2016)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

What makes an academic paper useful for health policy?

Christopher J. M. Whitty

BMC MEDICINE (2015)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

ESSAY Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?

Trisha Greenhalgh et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2014)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews

Geoff Wong et al.

BMC MEDICINE (2013)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses

Geoff Wong et al.

BMC MEDICINE (2013)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Synthesizing evidence on complex interventions: how meta-analytical, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches can contribute

Mark Petticrew et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2013)

Editorial Material Primary Health Care

Outside the Box Why are Cochrane reviews so boring?

Trisha Greenhalgh

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE (2012)

Article Social Work

The Myth of Evidence-Based Practice: Towards Evidence-Informed Practice

Isaac Nevo et al.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK (2011)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

Beverley J. Shea et al.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2007)

Review Nursing

The integrative review: updated methodology

R Whittemore et al.

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING (2005)

Review Education & Educational Research

'Clarity bordering on stupidity': where's the quality in systematic review?

M MacLure

JOURNAL OF EDUCATION POLICY (2005)

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review

T Greenhalgh et al.

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE (2005)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

The Cochrane Collaboration

A Levin

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2001)