4.7 Review

Cabozantinib versus sunitinib as initial therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma of intermediate or poor risk (Alliance A031203 CABOSUN randomised trial): Progression-free survival by independent review and overall survival update

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages 115-125

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.02.012

Keywords

Cabozantinib; First-line; Sunitinib; IMDC risk groups; Advanced renal cell carcinoma

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180791, U10CA180833, U10CA180850, U10CA180857, U10CA180867]
  2. Exelixis, Inc.
  3. Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Kidney SPORE and Program
  4. Kohlberg Chair at Harvard Medical School
  5. Trust Family, Michael Brigham, and Loker Pinard Funds for Kidney Cancer Research at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  6. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant/Core Grant [P30 CA008748]
  7. Exelixis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The randomised phase 2 CABOSUN trial comparing cabozantinib with sunitinib as initial therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of intermediate or poor risk met the primary end-point of improving progression-free survival (PFS) as assessedby investigator. We report PFS by independent radiology review committee (IRC) assessment, ORR per IRC and updated overall survival (OS). Patients and methods: Previously untreated patients with advancedRCCof intermediate or poor risk by IMDC criteria were randomised 1: 1 to cabozantinib 60 mg daily or sunitinib 50 mg daily (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). Stratification was by risk group and presence of bone metastases. Results: A total of 157 patients were randomised 1: 1 to cabozantinib (n = 79) or sunitinib (n = 78). Median PFS per IRC was 8.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.8-14.0) versus 5.3 months (95% CI 3.0-8.2) for cabozantinib versus sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48 [95% CI 0.31-0.74]; two-sided p = 0.0008), and ORR per IRC was 20% (95% CI 12.0-30.8) versus 9% (95% CI 3.7-17.6), respectively. Subgroup analyses of PFS by stratification factors and MET tumour expression were consistent with results for the overall population. With a median follow-up of 34.5 months, median OS was 26.6 months (95% CI 14.6enot estimable) with cabozantinib and 21.2 months (95% CI 16.3-27.4) with sunitinib (HR 0.80 [95% CI 0.53-1.21]. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 68% for cabozantinib and 65% for sunitinib. Conclusions: In this phase 2 trial, cabozantinib treatment significantly prolonged PFS per IRC compared with sunitinib as initial systemic therapy for advanced RCC of poor or intermediate risk. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available