4.7 Article

Numerical study of the effect of uneven proppant distribution between multiple fractures on shale gas well performance

Journal

FUEL
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages 189-198

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.074

Keywords

Proppant distribution; Marcellus shale; Sensitivity study; Gas desorption; Geomechanics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uniform proppant distribution in multiple perforation clusters after hydraulic fracturing plays an important role in the commercial production of shale gas. However, it is very challenging to achieve a uniform proppant distribution during operation. In some cases, proppant distribution is uneven in different clusters within the same hydraulic fracturing stage. The effect of the uneven proppant distribution on well performance is not well understood and has been largely neglected in most reservoir simulations. Hence, it is paramount to develop a reservoir simulation approach to properly examine the relationship between proppant distribution and well performance for shale gas reservoirs. In this paper, we use numerical reservoir simulation to model the proppant distribution. The reservoir model with multiple hydraulic fractures is validated by field production data from Marcellus shale. Effects of gas desorption and stress-dependent fracture conductivity are considered in the simulation model. We perform sensitivity studies to quantify the key parameters affecting the well performance between uniform and non-uniform proppant distribution. The six variables, which are cluster spacing, initial reservoir pressure, fracture conductivity, fracture half-length, fracture height, and matrix permeability, are investigated. The fracture conductivity ratio of 1:1.5:2.5:4 for four clusters in the same fracturing stage is investigated for the uneven proppant distribution scenario. This work provides insights into a better understanding of the effect of proppant distribution on well performance. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available