4.4 Article

Change in VO2max and time trial performance in response to high-intensity interval training prescribed using ventilatory threshold

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 118, Issue 9, Pages 1811-1820

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-3910-3

Keywords

Intermittent exercise; Anaerobic threshold; Peak power output; Cardiorespiratory fitness; Individual responses

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Completion of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) leads to significant increases in maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) and oxidative capacity. However, individual responses to HIIT have been identified as approximately 20-40% of individuals show no change in VO2max, which may be due to the relatively homogeneous approach to implementing HIIT. Purpose: This study tested the effects of HIIT prescribed using ventilatory threshold (VT) on changes in VO2max and cycling performance. Methods: Fourteen active men and women (age and VO2max = 27 +/- 8 year and 38 +/- 4 mL/kg/min) underwent nine sessions of HIIT, and 14 additional men and women (age and VO2max = 22 +/- 3 year and 40 +/- 5 mL/kg/min) served as controls. Training was performed on a cycle ergometer at a work rate equal to 130%VT and consisted of eight to ten 1 min bouts interspersed with 75 s of recovery. At baseline and post-testing, they completed progressive cycling to exhaustion to determine VO2max, and on a separate day, a 5 mile cycling time trial. Results: Compared to the control group, HIIT led to significant increases in VO2max (6%, p = 0.007), cycling performance (2.5%, p = 0.003), and absolute VT (9 W, p = 0.005). However, only 57% of participants revealed meaningful increases in VO2max and cycling performance in response to training, and two showed no change in either outcome. Conclusions: A greater volume of HIIT may be needed to maximize the training response for all individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available