Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 343-348Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000807
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Direccion de Investigacion y Doctorado (DIDEMUC), Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
- Research Fund, Direccion de Investigacion y Doctorado (DIDE-MUC), Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Catolicade Chile
Ask authors/readers for more resources
BACKGROUNDPostoperative vomiting (POV) is a frequent complication of tonsillectomy in children. In adult patients undergoing abdominal surgeries, the use of intravenous lidocaine infusion can prevent POV.OBJECTIVETo evaluate the anti-emetic effect of an intravenous lidocaine infusion used as an adjuvant to general anaesthesia, in children undergoing elective ear, nose and throat surgery.DESIGNDouble-blind, randomised, controlled study.SETTINGHospital-based, single-centre study in Chile.PATIENTSASA I-II children, aged 2 to 12 years, scheduled for elective tonsillectomy.INTERVENTIONWe standardised the induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to lidocaine (1.5mgkg(-1) intravenous lidocaine over 5min followed by 2mgkg(-1)h(-1)) or 0.9% saline (at the same rate and volume). Infusions were continued until the end of the surgery.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESPresence of at least one episode of vomiting, retching or both in the first 24h postoperatively (POV).SECONDARY OUTCOMESPlasma concentrations of lidocaine and postoperative pain.RESULTSNinety-two children were enrolled. Primary outcome data were available for 91. In the Lidocaine group, 28 of 46 patients (60.8%) experienced POV, compared with 37 of 45 patients (82.2%) in the Saline group [difference in proportions 21.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8 to 38.8), P=0.024]. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that when we assumed that the patient in the Saline group lost to follow-up did not have POV, the difference in proportions decreased to 19.6% (95% CI, 0.9 to 37.2), with an unadjusted odds ratio of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.97, P=0.044). The odds of having POV were 62% less likely in those patients receiving lidocaine compared with patients in the Saline group. The mean lidocaine plasma concentration was 3.91gml(-1) (range: 0.87 to 4.88).CONCLUSIONUsing an intravenous lidocaine infusion as an adjuvant to general anaesthesia decreased POV in children undergoing elective tonsillectomy.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01986309.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available