4.7 Article

A 10 year study of hospitalized atrial fibrillation-related stroke in England and its association with uptake of oral anticoagulation

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 39, Issue 32, Pages 2975-2983

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy411

Keywords

Atrial fibrillation; Anticoagulation; Stroke

Funding

  1. British Heart Foundation [PG/13/81/30474]
  2. Wellcome Trust [206470/Z/17/Z]
  3. Wellcome Trust [206470/Z/17/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims To determine whether changing patterns of anticoagulant use in atrial fibrillation (AF) have impacted on stroke rates in England. Methods and results English national databases, 2006-2016, were interrogated to assess stroke admissions and oral anticoagulant use. The number of patients with known AF increased linearly from 692 054 to 983 254 (prevalence 1.29% vs. 1.71%). Hospital episodes of AF-related stroke/100 000 AF patients increased from 80/week in 2006 to 98/week in 2011 and declined to 86/week in 2016 (2006-2011 difference 18.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 17.9-18.1, 2011-2016 difference -12.0, 95% CI -12.1 to -11.9). Anticoagulant use amongst patients with CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc >= 2 increased from 48.0% to 78.6% and anti-platelet use declined from 42.9% to 16.1%; the greatest rate of change occurred in the second 5 year period (for anticoagulants 2006-2011 difference 4.8%, 95% CI 4.5-5.1%, 2011-2016 difference 25.8%, 95% CI 25.5-26.1%). After adjustment for AF prevalence, a 1% increase in anticoagulant use was associated with a 0.8% decrease in the weekly rate of AF-related stroke (incidence rate ratio 0.992, 95% CI 0.989-0.994). Had the use of anticoagulants remained at 2009 levels, 4068 (95% CI 4046-4089) more strokes would have been predicted in 2015/2016. Conclusion Between 2006 and 2016, AF prevalence and anticoagulant use in England increased. From 2011, hospitalized AF-related stroke rates declined and were significantly associated with increased anticoagulant uptake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available