Journal
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
Volume 129, Issue 3, Pages 673-688Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2191-y
Keywords
Discretionary environmental accounting narratives; Environmental sensitivity; Political ideology; Punitive damage award; Trust
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This experimental study extends prior capital market and environmental accounting research by utilizing the theoretical underpinnings of legitimation through impression management, source credibility bias, perceived trust, and ideology in assessing the influence of discretionary environmental accounting narratives on jurors' punitive damage award assessments. We utilize mock jurors as environmental stakeholders and find that: (1) jurors in a court case involving corporate environmental malfeasance assess lower punitive damage awards against a firm that provides discretionary disclosure on its website regarding future abatement and control narratives, (2) environmental sensitivity of the firm's industry moderates the negative relationship between the discretionary disclosure and jurors' punitive damage award assessments, and (3) juror's perceived trust toward firm management mediates the prior moderation effect. Further, juror political ideology is found to affect the punitive damage award assessments, with liberal jurors levying comparatively higher awards than conservative jurors.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available