4.7 Article

THE HISTORY OF R-PROCESS ENRICHMENT IN THE MILKY WAY

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 807, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/2/115

Keywords

Galaxy: abundances; Galaxy: evolution; methods: numerical; stars: abundances

Funding

  1. NSF [AST-1109447, AST-0847563, OIA-112445329745]
  2. David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  3. NASA through Hubble Fellowship [HST-HF-51338.001-A]
  4. Space Telescope Science Institute
  5. NASA [NAS5-26555, NNX12AF87G]
  6. STFC [ST/K000985/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K000985/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Office of Integrative Activities
  9. Office Of The Director [1124453] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the production sites and the enrichment history of r-process elements in the Galaxy, as traced by the [Eu/Fe] ratio, using the high resolution, cosmological zoom-in simulation Eris. At z = 0, Eris represents a close analog to the Milky Way, making it the ideal laboratory to understand the chemical evolution of our Galaxy. Eris formally traces the production of oxygen and iron due to supernovae (SNe) Ia and SNe II. We include in post-processing the production of r-process elements from compact binary mergers. Unlike previous studies, we find that the nucleosynthetic products from compact binary mergers can be incorporated into stars of very low metallicity and at early times, even with a minimum delay time of 100 Myr. This conclusion is relatively insensitive to modest variations in the merger rate, minimum delay time, and the delay time distribution. By implementing a first-order prescription for metal mixing, we can further improve the agreement between our model and the data for the chemical evolution of both [alpha/Fe] and [Eu/Fe]. We argue that compact binary mergers could be the dominant source of r-process nucleosynthesis in the Galaxy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available