4.7 Article

THE INTERACTION OF VENUS-LIKE, M-DWARF PLANETS WITH THE STELLAR WIND OF THEIR HOST STAR

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 806, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/41

Keywords

magnetohydrodynamics (MHD); planets and satellites: atmospheres; planets and satellites: magnetic fields; planets and satellites: terrestrial planets

Funding

  1. Smithsonian Institution Consortium
  2. Smithsonian Institute Competitive Grants Program for Science (CGPS) grant Can Exoplanets Around Red Dwarfs Maintain Habitable Atmospheres?
  3. NASA Astrobiology Institute grant [NNX15AE05G]
  4. NASA ESS
  5. NASA ESTO-CT
  6. NSF KDI
  7. DoD MURI
  8. NASA [NAS8-03060]
  9. Directorate For Geosciences [1322543] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1322543] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. NASA [NNX15AE05G, 805157] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the interaction between the atmospheres of Venus-like, non-magnetized exoplanets orbiting an M-dwarf star, and the stellar wind using a multi-species MHD model. We focus our investigation on the effect of enhanced stellar wind and enhanced EUV flux as the planetary distance from the star decreases. Our simulations reveal different topologies of the planetary space environment for sub- and super-Alfvenic stellar wind conditions, which could lead to dynamic energy deposition into the atmosphere during the transition along the planetary orbit. We find that the stellar wind penetration for non-magnetized planets is very deep, up to a few hundreds of kilometers. We estimate a lower limit for the atmospheric mass-loss rate and find that it is insignificant over the lifetime of the planet. However, we predict that when accounting for atmospheric ion acceleration, a significant amount of the planetary atmosphere could be eroded over the course of a billion years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available