4.7 Article

Temperature-responsive ionic liquid extraction and separation of the aromatic sulfur compounds

Journal

FUEL
Volume 140, Issue -, Pages 590-596

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.09.083

Keywords

Temperature-responsive; Extractive desulfurization; Ionic liquid; Fuel

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21106055, 21266007, 21376109]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20131207]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extraction of aromatic sulfur compounds from model oil using a temperature-responsive ionic liquid (IL) N-butyl-N-methylpiperidinium tetrachloroferrate ([C(4)mpip]FeCl4) as extractant has been investigated. In the extractive desulfurization process, liquid-liquid equilibrium was obtained at 45 degrees C for 10 min. After the extraction system was cooled to room temperature, the IL returned to solid due to the reversible thermoregulated phase transition of the IL. Therefore, it was easy for separation of oil and solid [C(4)mpip]FeCl4. The extraction efficiency and Nernst partition coefficient (K-N) could get to 45.5% and 2.92, respectively, after a single extraction of DBT. Some important factors, such as extraction temperature, the amount of IL, initial sulfur content, multiple extractions, reusability and the mutual solution were investigated. The extraction ability of different sulfur compounds followed the order DBT > BT > 4,6-DMDBT. Finally, the extraction mechanism was studied systematically with experimental and theoretical methods. Compared with the extraction abilities of another three ILs, [C(8)mpip]FeCl4, [C(12)mpip]FeCl4 and [C4Py]FeCl4, the size and aromatic structure of cation may be two positive factors but not the main extraction mechanism. The coordination interaction between Fe atom of IL and S atom of DBT was confirmed by IR spectra and theoretical computation. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available