4.4 Article

Vagus nerve stimulation for 6-to 12-year-old children with refractory epilepsy: Impact on seizure frequency and parenting stress index

Journal

EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 83, Issue -, Pages 119-123

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.12.009

Keywords

Vagus nerve stimulation; Parenting stress index; School age; Refractory epilepsy

Funding

  1. Taiwan Child Neurology Society [TCNS-2014-001]
  2. Chung Shan Medical University [CSH-2016-A-018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Refractory epilepsy (RE) is frequently associated with neuropsychological impairment in children and may disrupt their social development. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) had been reported to have beneficial effects on behavioral outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare Parenting Stress Index (PSI) scores before and after VNS device implantation in children with RE, especially those who experienced seizure frequency reduction. Methods: We conducted a one-group pretest-posttest study in school age children with RE. Seizure frequency and PSI were recorded at 12 months after VNS device implantation. Results: Treatment with VNS was significantly associated with reduced seizure frequency and parental stress as measured by PSI. Factors contributing to seizure frequency included idiopathic/cryptogenic etiology and neurobehavioral comorbidities. In children with reduced seizure frequency, statistically significant improvements in the child domain of the PSI on the subscales of mood and reinforces parent were found. In the parent domain, the scores for social isolation were reduced. Conclusions: Treatment with VNS was significantly associated with reduced seizure frequency and improved PSI scores, especially within the child domain on the mood and reinforces parent subscales. These findings suggest that VNS reduced not only seizure frequency but also the psychological burden on children with RE. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available