4.3 Article

Extracurricular activities and the development of social skills in children with intellectual and specific learning disabilities

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH
Volume 59, Issue 7, Pages 678-687

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jir.12171

Keywords

children with intellectual disability; children with specific learning disability; social activities; social competence

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health/National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R01 HD35988]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundChildren with intellectual disability and specific learning disabilities often lack age-appropriate social skills, which disrupts their social functioning. Because of the limited effectiveness of classroom mainstreaming and social skills training for these children, it is important to explore alternative opportunities for social skill acquisition. Participation in social activities is positively related to children's social adjustment, but little is known about the benefits of activity participation for children with intellectual and specific learning disabilities. MethodsThis study investigated the association between frequency and type of social activity participation and the social competence of 8-11-year-old children with intellectual disability (n=40) and specific learning disabilities (n=53), in comparison with typically developing peers (n=24). ResultsMore time involved in unstructured activities, but not structured activities, was associated with higher levels of social competence for all children. This association was strongest for children with intellectual disability, suggesting that participation in unstructured social activities was most beneficial for these children. ConclusionFuture research on the quality of involvement is necessary to further understand specific aspects of unstructured activities that might facilitate social development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available