4.6 Article

Controlling for Frailty in Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies of Older Adults Validation of an Existing Medicare Claims-based Algorithm

Journal

EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 556-561

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000833

Keywords

comparative effectiveness research; confounding; frailty; Medicare; pharmacoepidemiology

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HHSN268201100005C, HHSN268201100006C, HHSN268201100007C, HHSN268201100008C, HHSN268201100009C, HHSN268201100010C, HHSN268201100011C, HHSN268201100012C]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01/56 AG023178, R01 CA174453, R01 HL118255, R21-HD080214]
  3. NC TraCS Institute, UNC Clinical and Translational Science Award [UL1TR001111]
  4. Amgen
  5. AstraZeneca
  6. Core Faculty of the Comparative Effectiveness Research Strategic Initiative, NC TraCS Institute, UNC Clinical and Translational Science Award [UL1TR001111]
  7. Center for Pharmacoepidemiology
  8. GSK
  9. UNC Chapel Hill
  10. PhRMA Foundation Research Starter Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Frailty is a geriatric syndrome characterized by weakness and weight loss and is associated with adverse health outcomes. It is often an unmeasured confounder in pharmacoepidemiologic and comparative effectiveness studies using administrative claims data. Methods: Among the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Visit 5 participants (2011-2013; n = 3,146), we conducted a validation study to compare a Medicare claims-based algorithm of dependency in activities of daily living (or dependency) developed as a proxy for frailty with a reference standard measure of phenotypic frailty. We applied the algorithm to the ARIC participants' claims data to generate a predicted probability of dependency. Using the claims-based algorithm, we estimated the C-statistic for predicting phenotypic frailty. We further categorized participants by their predicted probability of dependency (<5%, 5% to <20%, and = 20%) and estimated associations with difficulties in physical abilities, falls, and mortality. Results: The claims-based algorithm showed good discrimination of phenotypic frailty (C-statistic = 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67, 0.74). Participants classified with a high predicted probability of dependency (>= 20%) had higher prevalence of falls and difficulty in physical ability, and a greater risk of 1-year all-cause mortality hazard ratio = 5.7 [95% CI = 2.5, 13]) than participants classified with a low predicted probability (<5%). Sensitivity and specificity varied across predicted probability of dependency thresholds. Conclusions: The Medicare claims-based algorithm showed good discrimination of phenotypic frailty and high predictive ability with adverse health outcomes. This algorithm can be used in future Medicare claims analyses to reduce confounding by frailty and improve study validity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available