4.3 Article

Bayesian hierarchical model for variations in earthquake peak ground acceleration within small-aperture arrays

Journal

ENVIRONMETRICS
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/env.2497

Keywords

Bayesian hierarchical model; ground motion variabilities; peak ground acceleration; posterior density function; strong-motion array

Funding

  1. Icelandic Centre for Research [141261-051/52/53]
  2. Eimskip Fund of the University of Iceland
  3. University of Iceland Research Fund
  4. Marie Curie International Re-integration Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge of the characteristics of earthquake ground motion is fundamental for earthquake hazard assessments. Over small distances, relative to the source-site distance, where uniform site conditions are expected, the ground motion variability is also expected to be insignificant. However, despite being located on what has been characterized as a uniform lava-rock site condition, considerable peak ground acceleration (PGA) variations were observed on stations of a small-aperture array (covering approximately 1km(2)) of accelerographs in Southwest Iceland during the olfus earthquake of magnitude 6.3 on May 29, 2008 and its sequence of aftershocks. We propose a novel Bayesian hierarchical model for the PGA variations accounting separately for earthquake event effects, station effects, and event-station effects. An efficient posterior inference scheme based on Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations is proposed for the new model. The variance of the station effect is certainly different from zero according to the posterior density, indicating that individual station effects are different from one another. The Bayesian hierarchical model thus captures the observed PGA variations and quantifies to what extent the source and recording sites contribute to the overall variation in ground motions over relatively small distances on the lava-rock site condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available