4.7 Article

Environmental analysis of a Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plant hybridised with different fossil and renewable fuels

Journal

FUEL
Volume 145, Issue -, Pages 63-69

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.12.068

Keywords

Life Cycle Assessment; Hybrid; Solar; Biomass; Fossil; Energy Payback Time

Funding

  1. MINECO [IPT-440000-2010-004]
  2. European Commission [FP7-ENERGY-2012-1 CP 308912]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The environmental performance of a 50 MW parabolic trough Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) plant hybridised with different fuels was determined using a Life Cycle Assessment methodology. Six different scenarios were investigated, half of which involved hybridisation with fossil fuels (natural gas, coal and fuel oil), and the other three involved hybridisation with renewable fuels (wheat straw, wood pellets and biogas). Each scenario was compared to a solar-only operation. Nine different environmental categories as well as the Cumulative Energy Demand and the Energy Payback Time (EPT) were evaluated using Simapro software for 1 MWh of electricity produced. The results indicate a worse environmental performance for a CSP plant producing 12% of the electricity from fuel than in a solar-only operation for every indicator, except for the eutrophication and toxicity categories, whose results for the natural gas scenario are slightly better. In the climate change category, the results ranged between 26.9 and 187 kg CO2 eq/MW h, where a solar-only operation had the best results and coal hybridisation had the worst. Considering a weighted single score indicator, the environmental impact of the renewable fuels scenarios is approximately half of those considered in fossil fuels, with the straw scenario showing the best results, and the coal scenario the worstones. EPT for solar-only mode is 1.44 years, while hybridisation scenarios EPT vary in a range of 1.72-1.83 years for straw and pellets respectively. The fuels with more embodied energy are biomethane and wood pellets. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available