4.7 Article

Comparison of emerging contaminants in receiving waters downstream of a conventional wastewater treatment plant and a forest-water reuse system

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 13, Pages 12451-12463

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1505-5

Keywords

Wastewater; Contaminants of emerging concern (CECs); Forest-water reuse; Nontargeted analysis; Surface water; Water reuse

Funding

  1. North Carolina State University Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources
  2. North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Bioenergy Research Initiative [G40100278314RSD]
  3. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Superfund Basic Research Program [5 P42ES005948]
  4. UNC Center for Environmental Health and Susceptibility [P30ES010126]
  5. ORISE Research Participation Program at the Office of Research and Development, US EPA
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [P42ES005948, P30ES010126] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Forest-water reuse (FWR) systems treat municipal, industrial, and agricultural wastewaters via land application to forest soils. Previous studies have shown that both large-scale conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and FWR systems do not completely remove many contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) before release of treated wastewater. To better characterize CECs and potential for increased implementation of FWR systems, FWR systems need to be directly compared to conventional WWTPs. In this study, both a quantitative, targeted analysis and a nontargeted analysis were utilized to better understand how CECs release to waterways from an FWR system compared to a conventional treatment system. Quantitatively, greater concentrations and total mass load of CECs was exhibited downstream of the conventional WWTP compared to the FWR. Average summed concentrations of 33 targeted CECs downstream of the conventional system were similar to 1000 ng/L and downstream of the FWR were similar to 30 ng/L. From a nontargeted chemical standpoint, more tentatively identified chemicals were present, and at a greater relative abundance, downstream of the conventional system as well. Frequently occurring contaminants included phthalates, pharmaceuticals, and industrial chemicals. These data indicate that FWR systems represent a sustainable wastewater treatment alternative and that emerging contaminant release to waterways was lower at a FWR system than a conventional WWTP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available