4.6 Article

Dynamics of the Oso-Steelhead landslide from broadband seismic analysis

Journal

NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 1265-1273

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-15-1265-2015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Geomorphology and Land-use Dynamics/Geophysics programs [1227083, 1148176]
  2. US National Science Foundation Division of Earth Sciences
  3. US National Science Foundation Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation
  4. Hazards SEES program [1331499]
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [1227083, 1148176] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  8. Directorate For Engineering [1331499] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We carry out a combined analysis of the short- and long-period seismic signals generated by the devastating Oso-Steelhead landslide that occurred on 22 March 2014. The seismic records show that the Oso-Steelhead landslide was not a single slope failure, but a succession of multiple failures distinguished by two major collapses that occurred approximately 3 min apart. The first generated long-period surface waves that were recorded at several proximal stations. We invert these long-period signals for the forces acting at the source, and obtain estimates of the first failure runout and kinematics, as well as its mass after calibration against the mass-centre displacement estimated from remote-sensing imagery. Short-period analysis of both events suggests that the source dynamics of the second event is more complex than the first. No distinct long-period surface waves were recorded for the second failure, which prevents inversion for its source parameters. However, by comparing the seismic energy of the short-period waves generated by both events we are able to estimate the volume of the second. Our analysis suggests that the volume of the second failure is about 15-30% of the total landslide volume, giving a total volume mobilized by the two events between 7 x 10(6) and 10 x 10(6) m(3), in agreement with estimates from ground observations and lidar mapping.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available