4.7 Article

Feasibility study of cadmium adsorption by palm oil fuel ash (POFA)-based low-cost hollow fibre zeolitic membrane

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 22, Pages 21644-21655

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-2286-6

Keywords

Adsorption; POFA; Hollow fibre membrane; Heavy metal; Agricultural waste; Cadmium

Funding

  1. UTM Zamalah, Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under the Higher Institution Centre of Excellence Scheme [R.J090301.7846.4J192]
  2. Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [R.J130000.7846.4F972]
  3. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia under the Research University Grant Tier 1 [Q.J130000.2546.16H40]
  4. Nippon Sheet Glass Foundation for Materials Science and Engineering under Overseas Research Grant Scheme [R.J130000.7346.4B218]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Palm oil fuel ash (POFA) is an agricultural waste which was employed in this study to produce novel adsorptive ceramic hollow fibre membranes. The membranes were fabricated using phase inversion-based extrusion technique and sintered at 1150 A degrees C. The membranes were then evaluated on their ability to adsorb cadmium (Cd(II)). These membranes were characterised using (nitrogen) N-2 adsorption-desorption analysis, field emission scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (FESEM-EDX) mapping, X-ray fluorescence (XRF), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analyses while adsorptivity activity was examined by batch adsorption studies. The adsorption test results show that the quantity of hollow fibre used and water pH level significantly affected the adsorption performance with the 3-fibre membrane yielding 96.4% Cd(II) removal in 30 min equilibrium time at pH 7. These results are comparable to those reported by other studies, and hence demonstrate a promising alternative of low-cost hollow fibre adsorbent membrane.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available