4.7 Article

Influence of labile dissolved organic matter on nitrate reduction in a seepage face

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages 10654-10667

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1302-1

Keywords

Submarine groundwater discharge; Subterranean estuaries; Nitrate removal; Organic matter; Seepage faces; Remineralisation

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT)
  2. EU (FEDER)
  3. Portuguese Government [PTDC/MAR/70247/2006]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/MAR/70247/2006] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seepage faces, the outer rim of subterranean estuaries, are an important reaction node for SGD-borne nitrate (NO3-) on a global scale. Labile dissolved organic matter (DOM) has been suggested to be a key factor constraining the NO3- removal rate in aquifer systems. To determine whether and to what extent the availability of labile DOM affects benthic NO3- reduction in seepage faces, a series of flow-through reactor (FTR) experiments with sandy sediment collected from a seepage face was conducted under oxic conditions. Experimental results revealed that the addition of labile DOM (glucose) to porewater did not trigger a significant enhancement in NO3- reduction rate. In contrast, the aerobic respiration was boosted from ca. 50 to 90 mu mol dm(-3) sediment h(-1) by glucose amendments, accounting for approximately 70% consumption of the labile DOM pool. This rapid consumption may increase the NO3- reducing capability within the sediment, but only indirectly. Together with fluorescent DOM (FDOM) analyses, it can be inferred that NO3- reducers tend to choose sediment organic matter the prime electron donor under the experimental conditions. As a result, enrichment of DOM in seepage faces, depending on composition, might only stimulate aerobic respiration and nitrification, thus promoting the increase of ensuing NO3- fluxes to adjacent coastal waters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available