4.8 Article

Metabolic Responses of Mytilus galloprovincialis to Fullerenes in Mesocosm Exposure Experiments

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 1002-1013

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b04089

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the project NANO-transfer [ERA NET SIINN PCIN-2015-182-CO2-01]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya [SGR 418, SGR 291]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, Mediterranean mussels (Mytilus gallopro-vincialis) were exposed through the diet to fullerene soot at three concentrations in parallel to a control group. Their metabolomics response was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-HRMS). The experiments were conducted in marine mesocosms, during 35 days (7 days of acclimatization, 21 days of exposure, and 7 days of depuration). Real conditions were emulated in terms of physicochemical conditions of the habitat. Results confirmed the bioaccumulation of fullerenes, and the metabolome of the exposed organisms revealed significant differences in the concentrations of seven free amino acids in comparison to the control group :An increase in small nonpolar amino acids (e.g., alanine) and branched chain amino acids (leucine and isoleucine) were observed. Also, glutamine concentrations decreased significantly, suggesting the activation of facultative anaerobic energy metabolism. Branched chain amino acids, such as leucine and isoleucine, followed the opposite trend after the highest level of exposure, which can imply hormesis effects. Other significant differences were observed on lipids content, such as the general increase of free fatty acids, i.e., long-chain fatty acids (lauric, myristic, and palmitic acids) when the concentration of exposure was increased. These results were consistent with hypoxia and oxidative stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available