4.8 Article

Electrochemical Stripping to Recover Nitrogen from Source-Separated Urine

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages 1453-1460

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05488

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) through the Reinventing the Nation's Urban Water Infrastructure (Re-NUWIt) Engineering Research Center (NSF) [CBET-0853512]
  2. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (NSF) [DGE 1106400]
  3. Ford Foundation Fellowship
  4. Harvey Fellowship
  5. U.S. National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Superfund Research Program [P42 ES004705]
  6. Superfund Research Center at University of California, Berkeley
  7. Big Ideas at Berkeley Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recovering nitrogen from separately collected urine can potentially reduce costs and energy of wastewater nitrogen removal and fertilizer production. Through benchtop experiments, we demonstrate the recovery of nitrogen from urine as ammonium sulfate using electrochemical stripping, a combination of electrodialysis and membrane stripping. Nitrogen was selectively recovered with 93% efficiency in batch experiments with real urine and required 30.6 MJ kg N-1 in continuous-flow experiments (slightly less than conventional ammonia stripping). The effects of solution chemistry on nitrogen flux, electrolytic reactions, and reactions with electro-generated oxidants were evaluated using synthetic urine solutions. Fates of urine-relevant trace organic contaminants, including electrochemical oxidation and reaction with electro-generated chlorine, were investigated with a suite of common pharmaceuticals. Trace organics (<0.1 mu g L-1) and elements (<30 mu g L-1) were not detected at appreciable levels in the ammonium sulfate fertilizer product. This novel approach holds promise for selective recovery of nitrogen from concentrated liquid waste streams such as source-separated urine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available