4.8 Article

Atmospheric CO2 Sequestration in Iron and Steel Slag: Consett, County Durham, United Kingdom

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 14, Pages 7892-7900

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01883

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/L014211/1]
  2. NERC
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  4. Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC)
  5. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) [NE/P019943/1]
  6. Chartered Institution of Wastes Management
  7. NERC [NE/L014211/1, NE/P019943/1, NE/L01405X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbonate formation in waste from the steel industry could constitute a nontrivial proportion of the global requirements for removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere at a potentially low cost. To utilize this potential, we examined atmospheric carbon dioxide sequestration in a >20 million ton legacy slag deposit in northern England, United Kingdom. Carbonates formed from the drainage water of the heap had stable carbon and oxygen isotope values between -12 and -25 parts per thousand and -5 and -18 parts per thousand for delta C-13 and delta O-18, respectively, suggesting atmospheric carbon dioxide sequestration in high-pH solutions. From the analyses of solution saturation states, we estimate that between 280 and 2900 tons of CO2 have precipitated from the drainage waters. However, by combining a 37 year long data set of the drainage water chemistry with geospatial analysis, we estimate that <1% of the maximum carbon-capture potential of the deposit may have been realized. This implies that uncontrolled deposition of slag is insufficient to maximize carbon sequestration, and there may be considerable quantities of unreacted legacy deposits available for atmospheric carbon sequestration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available