4.8 Article

Ruthenium Catalysts for the Reduction of N-Nitrosamine Water Contaminants

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 7, Pages 4235-4243

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05834

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1555549]
  2. Directorate For Engineering [1555549] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

N-Nitrosamines have raised extensive concern due to their high toxicity and detection in treated wastewater and drinking water. Catalytic reduction is a promising alternative technology to treat N-nitrosamines, but to advance this technology pathway, there is a need to develop more-efficient and cost-effective catalysts. We have previously discovered that commercial catalysts containing ruthenium (Ru) are unexpectedly active in reducing nitrate. This study evaluated supported Ru activity for catalyzing reduction of N-nitrosamines. Experiments with N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) show that contaminant is rapidly reduced on both commercial and in-house prepared Ru/Al2O3 catalysts, with the commercial material yielding an initial metal weight-normalized pseudo-first-order rate constant (k(0)) of 1103 +/- 133 L.g(Ru)(-1).h(-1) and an initial turnover frequency (TOF,) of 58.0 +/- 7.0 h(-1). NDMA is reduced to dimethylamine (DMA) and ammonia end-products, and a small amount of 1,1-dimethylhydrazine (UDMH) was detected as a transient intermediate. Experiment with a mixture of five N-nitrosamines spiked into tap water (1 mu g L-1 each) demonstrates that Ru catalysts are very effective in reducing a range of N-nitrosamine structures at environmentally relevant concentrations. Cost competitiveness and high catalytic activities with a range of contaminants provide a strong argument for developing Ru catalysts as part of the water purification and remediation toolbox.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available