4.8 Article

Isotope Fractionation Pinpoints Membrane Permeability as a Barrier to Atrazine Biodegradation in Gram-negative Polaromonas sp Nea-C

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 7, Pages 4137-4144

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06599

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ERC consolidator grant (MicroDegrade) - European Research Council [616861]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biodegradation of persistent pesticides like atrazine often stalls at low concentrations in the environment. While mass transfer does not limit atrazine degradation by the Gram-positive Arthrobacter aurescens TC1 at high concentrations (>1 mg/L), evidence of bioavailability limitations is emerging at trace concentrations (<0.1 mg/L). To assess the bioavailability constraints on biodegradation, the roles of cell wall physiology and transporters remain imperfectly understood. Here, compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA) demonstrates that cell wall physiology (i.e., the difference between Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria) imposes mass transfer limitations in atrazine biodegradation even at high concentrations. Atrazine biodegradation by Gram-negative Polaromonas sp. Nea-C caused significantly less isotope fractionation (epsilon(C) = 3.5 parts per thousand) than expected for hydrolysis by the enzyme TrzN (epsilon(C) = -5.0 parts per thousand) and observed in Gram-positive Arthrobacter aurescens TC1 (epsilon(C) = -5.4 parts per thousand). Isotope fractionation was recovered in cell-free extracts (epsilon(C) = -5.3 parts per thousand) where no cell envelope restricted pollutant uptake. When active transport was inhibited with cyanide, atrazine degradation rates remained constant demonstrating that atrazine mass transfer across the cell envelope does not depend on active transport but is a consequence of passive cell wall permeation. Taken together, our results identify the cell envelope of the Gram-negative bacterium Polaromonas sp. Nea-C as a relevant barrier for atrazine biodegradation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available