4.8 Article

Global Lithium Flow 1994-2015: Implications for Improving Resource Efficiency and Security

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages 2827-2834

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06092

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71403142, 71774100, 71690241]
  2. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST [YESS20160140]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Automotive Safety and Energy [ZZ2016-024]
  4. China Automotive Energy Research Center of Tsinghua University (CAERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium has been widely recognized as an essential metal for next-generation clean technologies. With the aim of identifying opportunities for improving lithium resource efficiency and security, this study establishes a long-term trade-linked material flow analysis framework to analyze lithium flow throughout the technological life cycle and across national boundaries during the 1994-2015 period. The results indicate that with broader purposes identified, global lithium production and consumption experienced rapid growth over the past decades. A widely distributed, actively functioning lithium trade network has been established, with the United States, China, the European Union, Chile, and Australia playing essential roles. Global lithium in-use stock, which is mainly embodied in ceramics and glass, reached 29 kilotons in 2015. The lithium stock contained in battery-related applications, together with the huge potential production of stock in future decades, represents a major opportunity for secondary lithium recovery. In the context of intensive international trade, international cooperation on lithium waste management is extremely important. It is also suggested that there is a high risk of lithium shortage for countries with strong dependence on lithium import. The establishment of domestic lithium reserves may be an option for these countries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available