4.8 Article

Current and Future United States Light-Duty Vehicle Pathways: Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economic Assessment

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages 2392-2399

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fuel Cell Technologies Office of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  2. Vehicle Technologies Office of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a cradle-to-grave (C2G) assessment of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and costs for current (2015) and future (2025-2030) light-duty vehicles. The analysis addressed both fuel cycle and vehicle manufacturing cycle for the following vehicle types: gasoline and diesel internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs), flex fuel vehicles, compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs), battery electric vehicles (BEVs), and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs). Gasoline ICEVs using current technology have C2G emissions of similar to 450 gCO(2)e/mi (grams of carbon dioxide equivalents per mile), while C2G emissions from HEVs, PHEVs, H-2 FCEVs, and BEVs range from 300-350 gCO(2)e/mi. Future vehicle efficiency gains are expected to reduce emissions to similar to 350 gCO(2)/mi for ICEVs and similar to 250 gCO(2)e/mi for HEVs, PHEVs, FCEVs, and BEVs. Utilizing low-carbon fuel pathways yields GHG reductions more than double those achieved by vehicle efficiency gains alone. Levelized costs of driving (LCDs) are in the range $0.25-$1.00/mi depending on time frame and vehicle-fuel technology. In all cases, vehicle cost represents the major (60-90%) contribution to LCDs. Currently, HEV and PHEV petroleum-fueled vehicles provide the most attractive cost in terms of avoided carbon emissions, although they offer lower potential GHG reductions. The ranges of LCD and cost of avoided carbon are narrower for the future technology pathways, reflecting the expected economic competitiveness of these alternative vehicles and fuels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available