4.7 Article

How important are maritime emissions for the air quality: At European and national scale

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 242, Issue -, Pages 565-575

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.011

Keywords

Atmospheric pollutants; Emissions; Shipping; Air quality modelling; Portugal

Funding

  1. FCT/MEC through national funds
  2. FEDER, within the Compete 2020 [PTDC/AAG-MAA/2569/2014 - POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016752]
  3. FEDER, within the CESAM [UID/AMB/50017 - POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007638]
  4. FEDER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to its dependence on fossil fuel combustion, emissions from the marine transport sector can significantly contribute to air pollution. This work aims to evaluate the impact of maritime transport emissions on air quality in Portugal using a numerical air quality modelling approach, with high-resolution emission data. Emissions from the European TNO inventory were compiled and preprocessed at hourly and high spatial (similar to 3 x 3 km(2)) resolutions. Scenarios with and without these maritime emissions were then simulated with the WRF-CHIMERE modelling system, extensively tested and validated for Portugal domain, in order to evaluate their impact on air quality. A simulation was performed for one year (2016) and the resulting differences were analysed in terms of spatial distribution, time series and deltas. The main deltas for NO2 and PM10 are located over international shipping routes and major ports, while O-3 concentrations are impacted in a larger area. The modelling results also indicate that shipping emissions are responsible for deltas in the concentration of NO2 higher than 20% over specific urban areas located in the west coast of Portugal, and less than 5% for PM10. For O-3 the relative contribution is low (around 2%) but this contribution is also observed at locations more than 50 km from the coast. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available