4.7 Article

Association between serum arsenic levels and gestational diabetes mellitus: A population-based birth cohort study

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 235, Issue -, Pages 850-856

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.016

Keywords

Arsenic; Prenatal exposure; Gestational diabetes; Birth cohort

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81330068, 81302449]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common obstetric complication with adverse effects on both mothers and their children. Previous studies revealed the link between Arsenic (As) exposure and incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM), but the data on the association between maternal As exposure and GDM is scarce. We examined this association among a population-based birth cohort. As concentrations were determined at multiple time points during pregnancy by ICP-MS. The association between As levels and GDM prevalence was examined using logistic regression model after adjustment for confounders. A total of 419 (12.85%) women were diagnosed with GDM. The incidences of GDM gradually increased with increasing quartiles of As levels with significant trend. As levels were associated with the GDM (95%CI: 1.29-2.43) at only the 4th quartile in the first trimester. After adjustment for maternal age, prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), monthly income, gestational age and parity, the association remains significant (95%CI: 1.22-2.38). Stratified analyses showed the associations were largely limited to normal maternal age (95%CI: 1.19-3.04) and normal weight women (95%CI: 1.18-2.66). Our study showed an association between As and GDM in a birth cohort and explored first trimester may be the critical period for As associated GDM. This association was universal in the general pregnant population of normal age and of normal weight. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available