4.7 Article

Evidence of niche partitioning among bacteria living on plastics, organic particles and surrounding seawaters

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 236, Issue -, Pages 807-816

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.027

Keywords

Microbial ecotoxicology; Plastisphere; Biofouling

Funding

  1. CNRS
  2. UPMC
  3. LOV
  4. Genoscope/CEA
  5. Tara Expeditions Foundation
  6. Veolia Environment Foundation
  7. Lorient Agglomeration
  8. Foundation Prince Albert II de Monaco
  9. IDEC
  10. Tara schooner and teams
  11. Serge Ferrari
  12. PLASTICMICRO project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plastic pollution is widespread in ocean ecosystems worldwide, but it is unknown if plastic offers a unique habitat for bacteria compared to communities in the water column and attached to naturally-occurring organic particles. The large set of samples taken during the Tara-Mediterranean expedition revealed for the first time a clear niche partitioning between free-living (FL), organic particle-attached (PA) and the recently introduced plastic marine debris (PMD). Bacterial counts in PMD presented higher cell enrichment factors than generally observed for PA fraction, when compared to FL bacteria in the surrounding waters. Taxonomic diversity was also higher in the PMD communities, where higher evenness indicated a favorable environment for a very large number of species. Cyanobacteria were particularly overrepresented in PMD, together with essential functions for biofilm formation and maturation. The community distinction between the three habitats was consistent across the large-scale sampling in the Western Mediterranean basin. 'Plastic specific bacteria' recovered only on the PMD represented half of the OTUs, thus forming a distinct habitat that should be further considered for understanding microbial biodiversity in changing marine ecosystems. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available