4.7 Article

Performance of ceramic disk filter coated with nano ZnO for removing Escherichia coli from water in small rural and remote communities of developing regions

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 238, Issue -, Pages 52-62

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.03.008

Keywords

Water safety; Ceramic disk filter; E. coli removal; Nano ZnO; Factorial analysis

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan [2016YFC0502800, 2016YFA0601502]
  2. National Science Foundation [51520105013, 51679087]
  3. 111 Program [B14008]
  4. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Global water safety is facing great challenges due to increased population and demand. There is an urgent need to develop suitable water treatment strategy for small rural and remote communities in low-income developing countries. In order to find a low-cost solution, the reduction of E. coil using ceramic water disk coated with nano ZnO was investigated in this study. The performance of modified ceramic disk filters was influenced by several factors in the filter production process. Based on the factorial analysis, the pore size of the disk filters was the most significant factor for influencing E. coil removal efficiency and the clay content was the most significant one for influencing flow rate of modified disk filters. The coating of nano ZnO led to the change of disk filter surface and porosity. The reduction of E. coli could be attributed to both filter retention and photocatalytic antibacterial activity of nano ZnO. The effects of filter operation factors including initial E. coli concentration, illumination time and lamp power on E. coli removal effectiveness were also revealed. The results can help find a safe and cost-effective approach to solve drinking water problems in small rural and remote communities of developing regions. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available