4.7 Article

Current and historical concentrations of poly and perfluorinated compounds in sediments of the northern Great Lakes - Superior, Huron, and Michigan

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 236, Issue -, Pages 373-381

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.065

Keywords

Core; Sediment; History; Distribution

Funding

  1. U.S. EPA Great Lakes Restoration Initiative with Assistance [GL-00E00538]
  2. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada [326415-07]
  3. Western Economic Diversification Canada [6578, 6807]
  4. RECETOX Research Infastructure [LM2015051, CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16 013/0001761]
  5. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  6. Canada Research Chair program, Department of Biology and Chemistry and State Key Laboratory in Marine Pollution, City University of Hong Kong
  7. Visiting Professor Program of King Saud University
  8. Einstein Professor Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current and historical concentrations of 22 poly- and perfluorinated compounds (PFASs) in sediment collected from Lake Superior and northern Lake Michigan in 2011 and Lake Huron in 2012 are reported. The sampling was performed in two ways, Ponar grabs of surface sediments for current spatial distribution across the lake and dated cores for multi-decadal temporal trends. Mean concentrations of the sum of PFASs (Sigma PFASs) were 1,5, 4.6 and 3.1 ng g(-1) dry mas (dm) in surface sediments for Lakes Superior, Michigan and Huron, respectively. Of the five Laurentian Lakes, the watersheds of Superior and Huron are the less densely populated by humans, and concentrations observed were typically less and from more diffuse sources, due to lesser urbanization and industrialization. However, some regions of greater concentrations were observed and might indicate more local, point sources. In core samples concentrations ranged from

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available