4.0 Article

Race/Ethnicity and Primary Language: Health Beliefs about Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Diverse, Low-Income Population

Journal

Publisher

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0075

Keywords

Colorectal cancer; minorities; health beliefs; prevention

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health [R01CA106773]
  2. National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases at the National Institutes of Health [K24DK080941]
  3. National Center for Research Resources at the National Institutes of Health [UL1 RR024131]
  4. AHRQ NRSA (University of Washington School of Public Health, Department of Health Services) [5T32 HS 13853-9]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an important cause of cancer death in adults in the U.S.; screening is effective but underutilized, particularly among minorities. The purpose of this paper was to explore whether health belief model (HBM) constructs pertaining to CRC screening differ by race/ethnicity and primary language. Data were from the baseline surveys of 933 participants (93.5%) in a randomized trial promoting CRC screening in San Francisco. Composite scores for each construct were created from multiple items, dichotomized for analysis, and analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Most participants were Asian (29.7%) or Hispanic (34.3%), and many were non-English speakers. Non-English speaking Hispanics (p<.001) and English-speaking Asians (p=.002) reported lower perceived susceptibility than non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). Non-English speaking Hispanics reported more and non-English speaking Asians fewer perceived barriers (psychological and structural) than NHW. Understanding how different populations think about CRC screening may be critical in promoting screening in diverse populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available