4.7 Article

Wildfire susceptibility mapping: Deterministic vs. stochastic approaches

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages 194-203

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.019

Keywords

Susceptibility mapping; Wildfires; Random forest; Extreme learning machines; Portugal

Funding

  1. Herbette Foundation of the University of Lausanne [2016-2-E-15]
  2. FIREXTR project [PTDC/ATPGEO/0462/2014]
  3. project Interact - Integrative Research in Environment, Agro-Chain and Technology [NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000017]
  4. FEDER/NORTE
  5. European Investment Funds by FEDER/COMPETE/POCI - Operacional Competitiveness and Internacionalization Programme [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006958]
  6. FCT - Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [UID/AGR/04033/2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wildfire susceptibility is a measure of land propensity for the occurrence of wildfires based on terrain's intrinsic characteristics. In the present study, two stochastic approaches (i.e., extreme learning machine and random forest) for wildfire susceptibility mapping are compared versus a well established deterministic method. The same predisposing variables were combined and used as predictors in all models. The Portuguese region of Dao-Lafoes was selected as a pilot site since it presents national average values of fire incidence and a high heterogeneity in land cover and slope. Maps representing the susceptibility of the study area to wildfires were finally elaborated. Two measures were used to compare the different methods, namely the location of the pixels with similar standardized susceptibility and total validation burnt area. Results obtained with the stochastic methods are very alike with the deterministic ones, with the advantage of not depending on a priori knowledge of the phenomenon. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available