4.6 Article

Electron acceptors for anaerobic oxidation of methane drive microbial community structure and diversity in mud volcanoes

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages 2370-2385

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14128

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Program of China [2016YFC0502104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41473079, 41673082, 41671270, 41273112]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences [2016039]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mud volcanoes (MVs) emit globally significant quantities of methane into the atmosphere, however, methane cycling in such environments is not yet fully understood, as the roles of microbes and their associated biogeochemical processes have been largely overlooked. Here, we used data from high-throughput sequencing of microbial 16S rRNA gene amplicons from six MVs in the Junggar Basin in northwest China to quantify patterns of diversity and characterize the community structure of archaea and bacteria. We found anaerobic methanotrophs and diverse sulfate- and iron-reducing microbes in all of the samples, and the diversity of both archaeal and bacterial communities was strongly linked to the concentrations of sulfate, iron and nitrate, which could act as electron acceptors in anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM). The impacts of sulfate/iron/nitrate on AOM in the MVs were verified by microcosm experiments. Further, two representative MVs were selected to explore the microbial interactions based on phylogenetic molecular ecological networks. The sites showed distinct network structures, key species and microbial interactions, with more complex and numerous linkages between methane-cycling microbes and their partners being observed in the iron/sulfate-rich MV. These findings suggest that electron acceptors are important factors driving the structure of microbial communities in these methane-rich environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available