4.6 Article

Effects of historical and projected land use/cover change on runoff and sediment yield in the Netravati river basin, Western Ghats, India

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 77, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-018-7317-6

Keywords

Land use/land cover; River basin; Streamflow; Sediment yield; Modelling

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the effects of changes in historical and projected land use land cover (LULC) on monthly streamflow and sediment yield for the Netravati river basin in the Western Ghats of India are explored using land use maps from six time periods (1972, 1979, 1991, 2000, 2012, and 2030) and the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT). The LULC for 2030 is projected using the land change modeller with the assumption of normal growth. The sensitivity analysis, model calibration, and validation indicated that the SWAT model could reasonably simulate streamflow and sediment yield in the river basin. The results showed that the spatial extent of the LULC classes of urban (1.80-9.96%), agriculture (31.38-55.75%), and water bodies (1.48-2.66%) increased, whereas that of forest (53.04-27.03%), grassland (11.17-4.41%), and bare land (1.09-0.16%) decreased from 1972 to 2030. The streamflow increased steadily (7.88%) with changes in LULC, whereas the average annual sediment yield decreased (0.028%) between 1972 and 1991 and increased later (0.029%) until 2012. However, it may increase by 0.43% from 2012 to 2030. The results indicate that LULC changes in urbanization and agricultural intensification have contributed to the increase in runoff, amounting to 428.65 and 58.67 mm, respectively, and sediment yield, amounting to 348 and 43 ton/km(2), respectively, in the catchment area from 1972 to 2030. The proposed methodology can be applied to other river basins for which temporal digital LULC maps are available for better water resource management plans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available