4.5 Article

Modeling the Aggregation Propensity and Toxicity of Amyloid-β Variants

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 215-229

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-150046

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid-beta; hydrophilic surface; protein aggregation; structure-activity relations

Categories

Funding

  1. Technical University of Denmark

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein aggregation is a hallmark of many neurodegenerative disorders. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is directly linked to deposits of amyloid-beta(A beta) derived from the amyloid-beta protein precursor (A beta PP), and multiple experimental studies have investigated the aggregation behavior of these amyloids. The present paper reports modeling of the aggregation propensities and cell toxicities of genetic variants of A beta known to increase disease risk. From correlation to experimental data, and using four distinct experimental structures to test structural sensitivity, we find that the Spatial Aggregation Propensity (SAP) formalism can describe the relative experimental aggregation propensities of A beta(42) variants (R-2 = 0.49 and 0.70, p similar to 0.02 and 0.002, for 1IYT and 1Z0Q conformations using a probe radius of 10 angstrom). Our analysis finds correlation between the reduction in hydrophilic surface and experimental aggregation propensities. Finally, we show that experimental cell toxicities of A beta variants are well described by computed SAP values, suggesting direct interplay between aggregation propensity and cell toxicity and providing a step toward a first computational estimator of A beta toxicity. The present study contributes to our understanding of amyloid aggregation and suggests a method to predict aggregation propensity and toxicity of A beta variants, and potentially to reduce aggregation propensities of amyloids by molecular intervention directed toward specific conformations of the peptides.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available