4.7 Article

Evaluation of the flexural strength and serviceability of concrete beams reinforced with different types of GFRP bars

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 173, Issue -, Pages 606-619

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.089

Keywords

Concrete; Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP); FRP bar; Beam; Strain; Crack width; Deflection; Serviceability; Design codes

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. NSERC Research Chair in Innovative FRP Reinforcement for Concrete Structures
  3. Fonds de la recherche du Quebec en nature et technologies (FRQ-NT)
  4. Ministry of Transportation of Quebec

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current available glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars have a modulus of elasticity ranges from 40 to 60 GPa in accordance with CSA S807-10 Canadian standard. The surface profile of GFRP bars, however, can be smooth, sand-coated, deformed, grooved, or ribbed, This study aimed at investigating the flexural behavior and serviceability performance of concrete beams reinforced with different types of GFRP bars. The test parameters were: (i) modulus of elasticity (46.4-69.3 GPa); (ii) surface profile (sand-coated and helically-grooved), and (iii) reinforcement ratio. The study included testing of 17 full-scale beams measuring 4,250 mm long x 200 nun wide x 400 mm deep reinforced with GFRP bars. The test results are presented and discussed in terms of deflection, crack width, strain, and load-carrying capacity. The cracking behavior of the tested beams tends to confirm that sand-coating of GFRP bars enhances the bond performance in concrete more than the helically-grooved profile. The curvature limit of 0.005/d seems to be feasible in controlling the serviceability of GFRP-reinforced concrete (GFRP-RC) beams. In addition, ACI 440.1R-06 and ACI 440.1R-15 underestimated the deflection, while ISIS M-03 and CSA S806-12 provided conservative deflection values at 0.30 of nominal moment capacity, M-n.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available