4.7 Article

Cyclic behavior modeling of reinforced concrete shear walls based on softened damage-plasticity model

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 166, Issue -, Pages 363-375

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.085

Keywords

Cyclic behavior; Shear wall; Softened damage-plasticity model; Multi-layer shell element; Quasi-Newton method; Plasticity offset

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51708106]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20170680]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0701400]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2242017k30002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a rational analysis procedure is presented to model the typical cyclic behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) shear wall structures. A recently developed multi-dimensional softened damage-plasticity damage model, where the compression-softening effect of reinforced concrete is considered, is adopted to describe the concrete material behaviors. The steel material behaviors follow a modified Menegotto-Pinto model that including strain hardening, Bauschinger effect and tension stiffening. The multi-layer shell element, which is capable of simulating the coupled in-plane/out-of-plane bending as well as in-plane direct shear and the coupled bending-shear behavior of RC shear walls, is used for the finite element modeling of the structures. To overcome the convergence issues in the analysis procedure, the quasi-Newton method is adopted to solve the nonlinear finite equations and the iterative secant stiffness with plasticity offset for cyclic loading is introduced. Finally, several numerical simulations of RC shear walls with different failure modes are given, illustrating that the developed numerical model can accurately predict the cyclic behavior of RC shear wall structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available