4.7 Article

Experimental study on dynamic compressive properties of fiber-reinforced reactive powder concrete at high strain rates

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 169, Issue -, Pages 119-130

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.036

Keywords

Reactive powder concrete; Split Hopkinson pressure bar; Energy absorption; Dynamic stress-strain responses; Dynamic increase factor

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578184, 51408167]
  2. postdoctoral scientific research developmental fund of Heilongjiang Province [LBH-Q15058]
  3. foundation of key lab of structures dynamic behavior and control of the ministry of education, Harbin Institute of Technology [HITCE201605]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dynamic compression tests were performed on reactive powder concrete (RPC) using split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) apparatus. A total of 102 RPC samples including plain RPC (PRPC), steel fiber-reinforced RPC (SFRPC) with 2% and 5% volumetric fractions of steel fiber, and hybrid fiber reinforced RPC (SPFRPC) with 0.2% polypropylene (PP) fiber and 2% steel fiber were characterized at high strain rate of 72-317 s(-1). The characteristics of wave transmission, dynamic compressive strength, compressive deformation, energy absorption ability, and dynamic increase factor (DIF) of RPC under high strain rate impact were systematically investigated. Results revealed that the dynamic compressive strength of PRPC was more sensitive than that of SFRPC. With the addition of 0.2% PP fiber, the dynamic compressive strength of SFRPC exhibited a slight decrease. The critical strain increased with increasing strain rate. In all cases of RPC, the critical damage variable decreased with increasing fiber content subjected to same strain rate impact. The energy absorption of RPC increased with increasing content of steel fiber, which was found to be higher than normal strength concrete and high strength concrete. It was observed that application of CEB formula to calculate DIF of RPC was not safe. Thus, an empirical formula for DIF of RPC was proposed based on test data of this study and existing literature results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available