4.4 Article

Soft impact responses of laminated glass simulated with the combined finite-discrete element method

Journal

ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 1460-1480

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/EC-10-2017-0386

Keywords

Damage; Combined finite-discrete element method (FDEM); Glass; Laminated glass; Soft impact

Funding

  1. Jiangsu Shuang-Chuang Program
  2. Suzhou University of Science and Technology Natural Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose This paper aims to investigate the responses of laminated glass under soft body impact, including elastic impact and fracture/fragmentation consideration. Design/methodology/approach The simulation uses the combined finite-discrete element method (FDEM) which combines finite element mesh into discrete elements, enabling the accurate prediction of contact force and deformation. Material rupture is modelled with a cohesive fracture criterion, evaluating the process from continua to discontinua. Findings Responses of laminated glass under soft impact (both elastic and fracture) agree well with known data. Crack initiation time in laminated glass increases with the increase of the outside glass thickness. With the increase of Eprojectile, failure mode is changing from flexural to shear, and damage tends to propagate longitudinally when the contact surface increases. Results show that the FDEM is capable of modelling soft impact behaviour of laminated glass successfully. Research limitations/implications The work is done in 2D, and it will not represent fully the 3D mechanisms. Originality/value Elastic and fracture behaviour of laminated glass under soft impact is simulated using the 2D FDEM. Limited work has been done on soft impact of laminated glass with FDEM, and special research endeavours are warranted. Benchmark examples and discussions are provided for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available