4.7 Article

Feed-in tariffs for solar microgeneration: Policy evaluation and capacity projections using a realistic agent-based model

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages 95-111

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.060

Keywords

Solar photovoltaics; Microgeneration; Agent-based model; Feed-in tariffs; Incentive policies

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK [EP/K036734/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/K036734/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since 2010, over 700,000 small-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) systems have been installed by households in Great Britain and registered under the feed-in tariff (FiT) scheme. This paper introduces a new agent-based model which simulates this adoption by considering decision-making of individual households based on household income, social network, total capital cost of the PV system, and the payback period of the investment, where the final factor takes into account the economic effect of FiTs. After calibration using Approximate Bayesian Computation, the model successfully simulates observed cumulative and average capacity installed over the period 2010-2016 using historically accurate FiTs; setting different tariffs allows investigation of alternative policy scenarios. Model results show that using simple cost control measures, more installation by October 2016 could have been achieved at lower subsidy cost. The total cost of supporting capacity installed during the period 2010-2016, totalling 2.4 GW, is predicted to be (sic)14 billion, and costs to consumers significantly exceed predictions. The model is further used to project capacity installed up to 2022 for several PV cost, electricity price, and FiT policy scenarios, showing that current tariffs are too low to significantly impact adoption, and falling PV costs are the most important driver of installation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available