4.7 Article

Do tidal stream energy projects offer more value than offshore wind farms? A case study in the United Kingdom

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 113, Issue -, Pages 28-40

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.030

Keywords

Tidal stream energy; Offshore wind; Cost-benefit analysis; Marginal emissions

Funding

  1. Center for Climate and Energy Decision Making (CEDM) [SES-0949710, SES-1463492]
  2. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [1463492] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Marine-based renewable energy could help the United Kingdom (UK) move towards a more sustainable and low carbon energy system. Today, offshore wind is the prevailing marine renewable technology but there is growing progress towards developing others, such as tidal stream energy (TSE) turbines which capture kinetic energy from tidal currents. Using historical operations data from 18 wind farms and simulated generation data for two TSE sites in the UK, we estimate that TSE projects offer about $10/MW h more in net social benefits than offshore wind projects. This estimate includes the value of energy generated, value of reduced marginal CO2 emissions, cost of visual changes to the landscape, and cost of energy generation forecast errors. However, relative to offshore wind, the increased cost of TSE projects far outweighs the increased social benefits. The levelized cost of energy (LCOE) of TSE projects is expected to be about $74/MW h to $330/MW h higher than offshore wind projects through 2050. Only with optimistic LCOE projections, small TSE projects (20 MW) may be competitive (when including increased net social benefits) with small offshore wind projects by 2020.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available