4.7 Article

A comparative assessment of ternary blends of three bio-alcohols with waste cooking oil and diesel for optimum emissions and performance in a CI engine using response surface methodology

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages 337-357

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.10.087

Keywords

Exhaust emissions; Engine optimization; Waste cooking oil; Yellow grease; Ternary blend; Butanol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recycling waste cooking oil (WCO) for use in diesel engines offers a sustainable solution for ecological wellbeing and energy security. Diesel-WCO-alcohol ternary blends provide a straightforward and cost-effective opportunity to utilise both a bio-component & a recycled component to partially replace diesel and to reduce viscosity of WCO instead of expensive pre-heating and trans-esterification. Three bio-alcohols, n-propanol (Pr), n-butanol (Bu) and n-pentanol (Pe) were chosen for this purpose. An investigation was carried out to compare the effects of adding three bio-alcohols to form ternary blends with WCO and diesel (D) individually (D50-WC030-Pr20, D50-WC030-Bu20 and D50-WC030-Pe20) for optimum engine characteristics by employing a response surface methodology (RSM) based optimization using a 3-factor x 3-level full factorial experimental design. Three alcohols, three injection timings (23 degrees, 25 degrees and 27 degrees CA bTDC) and three EGR rates (10, 20 and 30%) were chosen as factors and their levels. Regression models were developed for NOx, smoke, HC, CO, BTE and BSFC and were found to be statistically significant. Interactive effects between injection timing and EGR for all blends were presented. Pentanol was found to be a suitable alcohol for this purpose as the ternary blend D50-WC030-Pe20 injected at 23 degrees CA bTDC at 15% EGR had the highest desirability. Confirmatory tests validated that the models developed were adequate and the error in prediction is within 6%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available